Quote:
Originally Posted by UntoHim
I was wondering when our resident Unitarian friend would show up! Sorry Boxjobox, but I will only allow your false and heretical Unitarian garbage for one post....then off to the dungeon with ya me lad! And while you're down there you can pray-read "AND THE WORD WAS GOD" until you fall down and worship Jesus Christ as God, just as Thomas did when he proclaimed "MY LORD AND MY GOD!".
Amazing. On one thread we have trinitarians, doubletarians and now a unotarian(aka Unitarian)! Well, we can't all be right, now can we?
Sorry, but I am going to be rather strict on this thread. The topic is modalism as taught by Witness Lee. I'll allow some latitude...but just a little.
-
|
Is it Untohim or now Untohims?
My main point is that the early church as portrayed in Acts and Paul’s writings, which we hold as scripture/ Word of God did not contain anything related to the aforementioned topic. So should not a “recovered” church also be in the same mind? If it was the, shall I say, mind of the Spirit that the Church would be based on such concepts, it should follow that those concepts were spoken, reinforced, taught, exemplified, but alas, the church did quite well in the early days without any of those ideas. Both Jews and gentiles would have no clue God is triune unless such were clearly taught by Paul. If it was good enough for the foundational church to exist and flourish without such concepts, and there is a desire to “ recover” what was lost, seems to me that a return to the teachings and thoughts of Paul- the wise master builder, who gave the whole counsel of God in preaching and building the church- seems that is what should be the contents of the church.
If needs must be, Ill have to have another go at the alt-site, but me thinks a good healthy discussion by those of us who went through the LC/ WL would be beneficial to all. Is there a criteria I should follow in expressing my views? I really try to tie my opinions to the WL/ LSM controversy.