[UntoHim]

Ohio, I think you're confusing "accommodating" with "agreeing". Maybe they're the same thing to you? I've been accommodating diverse views on this forum for over 12 years now, and to insinuate otherwise is not very accommodating of you!

Put the topic of the nature of God and the Trinity to bed? Not on your life, my man! And I'll tell you the same thing I told dear brother Sons to Glory! - You're free to participate and you're free to just sit this one out. If genuine, open discussion on this topic gets you too riled up, I would suggest the latter. Just a suggestion!

Nobody's been tared and feathered. Really?

I noticed you declined to comment on the last paragraph. Why is that? I think one of the main issues is that you still think Witness Lee's teachings/interpretations regarding the Trinity are biblical. OK, that's all well and good, but you seem to insist that they stand alone, apart from any comparing and contrasting with the teachings/interpretations from Christian teachers/scholars/apologists going back to the earliest era of church history. I hope that you understand that no ones teachings/interpretations stand alone, no matter how much they tell you that they teach "the pure word". This goes for everybody - the so-called church fathers, the earliest of the Christians who helped formulate the earliest doctrine statements and declarations, Ignatius, Clement, Polycarp, Augustine, up to Edwards and Wesley, Darby, all the way up to Piper - No one stands alone.
-