[JJ]

Originally Posted by aron

And are we to surmise that the acts (activities, actions, doings) of the apostles are fundamentally different than the disciples' actions which are caused by healthy teachings and are encapsulated in the terms "God's economy" in the RecV? I don't suppose so, and wonder why anyone else would. After all, the Acts of the Apostles follow close upon the gospels, both in time and spirit. And this was the same gospel that Paul was exporting to the non-Jews. The "right hand of fellowship" phrase in Gal 2 makes this plain to his intended readers.

For more corroboration from his epistles, we have the two chapters in 2 Cor on how Jesus became poor that they (the gentiles) might be rich (8:9). Should they not also be inspired to follow? Okay, then: "Now about the collection for the saints, you are to do as I directed the churches of Galatia: On the first day of every week, each of you should set aside a portion of his income, saving it up, so that when I come no collections will be needed. Then, on my arrival, I will send letters with those you recommend to carry your gift to Jerusalem." ~1 Cor 16:1-3

We also have Paul's eager assent to the Jerusalem apostles to "remember the poor" (Gal 2:10) in his outreach to the nations, we have Roman's 15:22-29 telling them of the contributions of Macedonia and Achaea for the poor of Jerusalem.

Now, this collection and distribution may not constitute the sum total of "God's economy" but it lines up well with the overall theme. Give to those who can't repay you, and your reward will be great in heaven. Giving takes many forms, which forms fill the NT, and which satisfy the original mandate. "Love is the end (apotheosis, or culmination) of the law"

1Tim 1:5 says
“Now the goal of our instruction is love out of a pure heart, and a good conscience, and a sincere faith.” I think y’all are onto something