Quote:
Originally Posted by Freedom
It seems like they think that if enough time has passed, the situations in question are no longer important. On the contrary, the longer these things have gone unaddressed, the more relevant they become.
|
Seems it should be that way, but coming from LSM it isn't so.
When Ron spoke in Ambato in 2006(?) , why did he have to allude to Bill Mallon? That had been nearly 20 years in the past.
In the months prior to Bill Freeman's passing, why did Ron need to allude to Bill Freeman? That had been 25 years?
Then this past year it was John Ingalls.