Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeakersCorner
Peter, Quaint sentiment? Trite? Ouch!
Actually, Peter, to call my argument trite is astonishing to me. I have given a biblical illustration of the cost God paid in putting on the flesh. Call it stupid, call it erroneous, call it heresy if you want, but trite? You've got to be kidding. This point touches the entire theme of the Bible, the very essence of what it meant for God to put on the flesh.
|
SC, I think all kinds of inspirational views such as yours can stir us to worship Him, and inspire us to speak for Him. Let's forget all the demands for interpretational accuracies here. They bore me. They require boards and councils for approval, but lack the moving of the Spirit. They only speak to my head, not to my heart.
Hey, I'm not promoting gross error here, but to discover Christ, in new and unheard of ways, is "outlawed" only on that other forum.
Remember ... I'm the guy who has little interest in theological debate. Look at Peter's (no "double entendre" intended) first message in Acts 2 -- didn't he mess up the interpretation of Joel's prophecy? God will work that one out.