Quote:
Originally Posted by Jo S
Going a bit off topic
As I was making my last comment tracing the teaching of natural affection back to Watchman Nee, I couldn't help to think why this forum mostly lacks criticism toward Watchman Nee if much, if not all, of Lee's teaching were derived from him.
And then I thought how similar the lack of criticism of Nee is to that of Titus Chu here as well, especially when I view them all as part of the same polycephalic entity. Does anyone have a rational explanation for this before I start formulating theories?
Anyway, carry on....
|
Here are a few threads you should look at:
Nigel Tomes: LSM’s ‘Authority and Submission’ Tampers with the Trinity
What is the boundary of the Local Church
Reconsideration of the Vision
Misrepresenting God: Delegated Authority (Nee)
Wright Doyle’s Biography of Nee
“Early Nee” vs. “Later Nee”
The ground on Which the Church should be built [please note there are multiple threads on this doctrine of the ground of the church]
Article: Beware of the writings of the Watchman
Article: Nee’s ecclesiology
Authority and Submission
Nee’s ‘Ministry to the House or to the Lord’
Spiritual Authority by Watchman Nee
LSM’s Sacrament - the “Ground of the Local Church” Nigel Tomes
Problems with Watchman Nee
The “Functions” of the Parts of Man