Re: Erroneous teaching of Lee concerning natural affection
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jo S
Going a bit off topic
As I was making my last comment tracing the teaching of natural affection back to Watchman Nee, I couldn't help to think why this forum mostly lacks criticism toward Watchman Nee if much, if not all, of Lee's teaching were derived from him.
And then I thought how similar the lack of criticism of Nee is to that of Titus Chu here as well, especially when I view them all as part of the same polycephalic entity. Does anyone have a rational explanation for this before I start formulating theories?
Anyway, carry on....
|
Can you restate your question? I am looking for a rational explanation to what you are asking.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!.
Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point!
|