Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Absurd! Have you lost your mind? Sometimes you sound like you been drinking at AOC's bar.
The entire Muller Special Prosecutors Office was PREDICATED on actual evidence of collusion with the Russians. If none exists, then Trump was completely right to be outraged, threaten to fire Muller, call Comey a dirty cop and fire him, etc.
Where's the evidence? Of course what I said was a fair representation of what happened.
They spied on the Trump admin, they attempted to plant spies, they ran a sting operation to setup the Trump staff, they leaked classified info, they claimed evidence existed, they framed Flynn and Papadopolous, etc.
|
Where is the evidence:
1. Democrats email was hacked by the Russians
2. Russians used Social media to influence the election.
3. Donald Trump called on the Russians publicly to release Hillary Clinton's emails.
4. High level associates of Donald Trumps election campaign met with Russians who claimed to have incriminating evidence against Hillary Clinton.
To my opinion that is more than enough evidence to warrant an investigation (not an indictment).
Anyone who would not want to investigate knowing that is the one who is drinking Kool Aid.