Quote:
Originally Posted by awareness
Right on the canon, wrong on Jesus in the flesh. I believe that Jesus was a historical man in the flesh. I understand the arguments of the docetists and mythicists, but disagree. I think the historicity of Jesus is rather certain. Even the renowned "atheist" Professor Bart Ehrman defends against the mythicists that Jesus was a historical person.
|
Are you now saying that your "faith" has now descended to the level of renowned atheists, who begrudgingly admit that there must have been a man named Jesus?
Since it is "holy week," do you also admit that this Jesus rose from the dead, and is now seated in the heavens at the right hand of God the Father?