Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
The facts of the case prove truth or false witness. When every single claim of CB-F gets shredded with simple questioning, then we know it's not a matter of memory loss but memory "fabrications." Every part of her story was contrived and made up, and has gaping holes in her credibility. Not a shred of facts or collaboration?
The Polygraph was a lie, the witnesses she put forth rejected her, she lied about flying airplanes. Why? So that seasoned Democratic strategists would have lots of time to coach her testimony. There's no other reason.
Ever find out about where she taught? It's a training ground for feminist activists. She even lied about her house having two front doors being the reason for her therapy sessions.
More from John Nolte . . . |
Once again, my point is simple, if this had been done behind closed doors you discourage any political motive. What is the point? I think it is undeniable that it is a political play and that would only be effective if it is done in public.
The problem is there is not enough evidence to prove it is false. Once again, it is poor practice to judge the situation without evidence. The undeniable evidence is that Feinstein's behavior was shameful, political, and needs to be dealt with.