Quote:
Originally Posted by UntoHim
Drake, do you think we're all stupid here? Witness Lee said NO SUCH THING. HE SAID JAMES WAS DEVOID OF THE DIVINE REVELATION. PERIOD. Any qualifications put on such a heretical statement are meaningless and worthless. Kind of like when you say you are "becoming God in life and nature....but not in the Godhead".
Here's another outrageous, ignorant statement by Lee:
"The book of James is devoid of the main items in the New Testament."
Again, Lee just couldn't help himself. He exposed his utter ignorance and disrespect for the Word of God. How could the the book of James be "devoid of the main items in the New Testament" WHEN IT IS PART OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. This is part of the reason that many former members, and even some keen observers of the Local Church of Witness Lee claim that LC members think of Lee's teachings as equal to or EVEN ABOVE the Word of God. It's sick. It's pathetic. It's dangerous. It's sad. May God have mercy.
-
|
UntoHim,
Rather than a public exhibition of chest thumping... explain how James was enlightened concerning the main items in New Testament. If it is so obvious then you can show what Brother Lee missed in the book of James in less time than it takes you to craft a post filled with heat but absent of light.
By the way, there is no difference between the definition of "God's economy" and the "main items of the New Testament". Take your pick. If you think there is then you never understood or perhaps forgot what Brother's Nee and Lee taught concerning God's economy in the New Testament. It's is not heretical to assess James' letter as devoid of the main items of the New Testament or God's economy anymore then it is heretical for afazio to critique James/Jerusalem as causing problems in the infant church. It may seem different if you hold a double standard.
Still, I'd like to see that little booklet afazio wrote. Please post it here.
Thx,
Drake