Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
Yes. The mode of releasing the information was a grandstand of the worst kind. But you mistake mode of release for veracity, or lack thereof.
All of the claims of lies you make are without merit. You didn’t like how it played out so she was lying. She didn’t want to come forward so her reluctance proves lying. She doesn’t like to fly, so the delays are evidence of lying. She didn’t make any charge at the time, so she is lying. What a load of manure.
|
Really? Please show me the post where I said any of this? You have confused me with Ohio.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
Not now. There is a statute of limitations. You have absolutely no idea about what might have happened then. If it were brought forward at the time, you might never have heard of Brett Kavanaugh. And you may be right that it would never have been filed. But as so often happens in those kinds of cases, the woman is embarrassed that she allowed herself into the situation. She blames herself. And so on. So never files the charge. Never speaks of it to anyone, so no contemporaneous knowledge by anyone else.
|
I was not speaking about hypotheticals as to what might have been. I was pointing out that no DA would act on these claims today, when Feinstein got them. She knew this. She knew he had gone through 6 FBI background checks. She knew that the only value this would have is if she used it at the 11th hour to delay the confirmation. You have obviously not read all of my posts on this topic. I have made it very clear that there is a lot of evidence that the police can find to help verify these claims if they are made in a timely manner.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
Yes, that is a minefield for false accusations later. But it is interesting how many such false accusations are quickly discovered to clearly be false.
|
Are you talking about your own false accusations? 1. I have never once said that I thought Ford was lying. 2. I have never once mentioned or responded to her not wanting to fly. 3. I have never once said that her not making a charge 36 years ago should be a basis to think she is now lying. 4. I have never said that a DA would not have responded to her claim had she made it 36 years ago. Those are 4 accusations made by you in just a paragraph or two, all of which can easily be verified as false by looking at my posts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
You made some snarky comment about me not having any spine. Your answer is to just make stuff up and build a wall.
|
No I didn't. This is another false accusation. Is anything in this post true or is it all lies? Once again you are referring to a Post by Ohio, not me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
My response is to enforce existing laws, and work on better ones.
|
The only response I'm interested in is an apology.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
You confuse disagreement on politics with disagreement on the actual execution of the job. The speaking out against Trump is not about his political positions. It is about his lies and demeanor.
|
Really? Please direct me to the post where I am confused on this? Once again you are the one who has confused me for Ohio.
In the future do not delete the name of the person you are posting. You mingled quotes from me and Ohio, deleted the names, and pretended we were the same person. This is not a simple task to delete the name in each quote and had to have been done intentionally.