Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
So, your argument is based on circumstantial considerations, not something you can actually quote.
Most people that object to the ministry of Brother Lee do so for the reasons you cite.,, an overemphasis on the use of the messages, HWMR, exercise of authority in church governance, etc. I understand that POV though I see it much differently. However, no one I know in the local churches thinks Brother Lee was equal to the Lord Jesus or even Paul or other New Testament writers. His teachings are based on the revelation given to the authors of the New Testament and not net new revelation. He was not a a minister of original thought but recovered thought. And he never could violate the headship of our Lord Jesus.
As I mentioned to ByHisMercy, your sources are simply a repetion of each other. That is why I asked you for a specific statement from the ministry or anecdotally something you heard someone say, but up to this point you have not provided that but just your own opinion...and your are entitled to that but you are not entitled to your own facts.
Thx
Drake
|
Um, actually the teachings of Witness Lee isn't biblical in the sense that a good amount of his teachings are unbiblical (things like modalism, man being God (I mean if man was God then why bother worshipping God then? We might as well then just worship people, which would be idolatry and a big no-no ofc to God) There have been plenty of discussion on whether Witness Lee's teachings is biblical or not both on the forums and in the greater Christian community which I do not wish to rehash right now.