Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
Steve,
Let’s start this part of the conversation with Peter since you used him in your second example and his use of Psalm 34.
Peter was a divinely inspired author.
Did Peter express any erroneous human concepts?
Thanks
Drake
|
Does expressing supposed "erroneous human concepts" undermine the truth? And how do we define "erroneous human concepts?"
Does the expression of "erroneous human concepts" disqualify an author or his writings in scripture?
I think this takes us down a very slippery slope indeed. The Apostle Paul apparently expressed a few "erroneous human concepts" himself both before and after his salvation. He was complicit to the stoning of Stephen. A little erroneous? He later celebrated the Passover and then took a vow in Jerusalem, which the Lord did not approve of.
It is WL once again sowing seeds of doubt concerning the word of God. If I remember correctly, it was the serpent in the garden who first started this trend. Once we open up this Pandora's Box of doubt, we will now have inbred suspicions cast on every verse. Does this then reduce us to the safety of "red letter" verses?