Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangelical
Don't worry about Drake, worry about yourself - it's amazing how you put forward nonfactual statements, that could be refuted by the quoting of expert scholars, while claiming Lee was the worst historian ever. If you can't even get little facts straight...
We can thank the "worst in Martin Luther" for the Reformation, otherwise we'd all still be reading from the Latin Vulgate. He did not merely just copy the Catholic Bible and make it available for all..
As much as you and others criticize Lee and Luther for their views of James, you sound like closet Catholics to be honest - I could find similar statements on a Catholic forum. I don't know what non-Catholic people see in the book of James about Christ that Luther and many others could not see. You must really be better than great men like Martin Luther and others who could not find much Christ in it. There must be even a hint of faith+works in your justification doctrine - I don't think Luther would have accepted you as a Reformer tbh.
|
And where are your scholars who also have sanctioned Martin Luther the first Minister of the Age? Try to get your facts straight matey!
Taking my words out of context? I expect more from the current LSM mouthpiece. The "
worst in Martin Luther" comment referred specifically to his dismissal of the book of James (
"straw epistle fit for burning") and his anti-Semitic rants. But you knew that. And you call me a liar?
Your other deceptive technique is to present a false choice set, like
Drake does. Since I don't accept that Luther is the first MOTA of the Recovery, then I must be some contemptuous "
closet Catholic" like you find on other forums.