Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangelical
Further to the scholarly sources which I presented that shows that Huss did not recover justification by faith alone, here is a ChristianityToday article which supports the idea that Luther recovered justification by faith:
https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct...-by-faith.html
Luther’s emphasis on justification by faith was not a discovery, but a recovery.
It is good to see that scholars and a top historian can support Lee's belief that Luther recovered justification by faith.
Ohio is spreading lies twice - that Luther did not recovery justification by faith, and that Lee was a bad historian. |
For 1500 years God's chosen people were justified by faith in His Son's death on the cross. Read Miller's Church History or Broadbent or Schaaf. God has always had a people who were His own. I already told you that Luther said he was a Hussite -- he began to know these same truths one hundred years earlier -- and Huss learned from others.
There is no "recovery." It was called the "reformation." Go read the history books. Huss, Luther, Calvin, Farel, Tyndale, Zwingli, and thousands more tried to "reform" the Catholic Church. They couldn't do it.
They all got QUARANTINED by the pope, just like so many "reformers" like John Ingalls or Titus Chu in the LC's got quarantined by Lee and the Blindeds.
You and Lee act like there never was a genuine Christian, or a real church, or anyone saved by faith until Luther was born. Absurd. Read church history.
And, like I said, I would not believe a single thing Lee taught about church history unless I have second source corroborating evidence. Luther was not the first MOTA.
And I could care less if you call me a liar. Bible says all men are liars, only God is true!
