Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
Evangelical says he covered this issue at length on this thread. I'd appreciate someone pointing it out for us.
This is the kind of answer that Steel and Drake came up with. I'm not sure Evangelical even replied to the question.
How do we know if some of the RecV footnotes in the Psalms aren't merely expressing fallen human concepts? It sure looks plausible from here. Otherwise we'll have to assume that David often expressed such natural concepts in his writings, while Lee did not.
What kind of a Bible is that, based on such unchallenged assumptions? An idiosyncratic, personalised Bible. The ultimate vanity project.
|
We discussed Psalm 16 and others in "Repetition, Ritual, Religion".
I explained that not everything Lee wrote is found in the bible footnotes. Some of what you are looking for is found in his books.
This response might answer any and all questions you have on perceived inconsistencies or omissions in the Psalm footnotes.