Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
I see that you've nothing of substance to address my critique, otherwise you'd offer a rebuttal. So the diversionary tactics continue.
I didn't bring up the Psalms, another poster did. I made a comment and was asked to clarify, and I did ( or tried at any rate). Then you started the diversionary tactics - "not every Psalm" is of the New Covenant. I answered that post and now, apparently lacking recourse, you fall back on "shoot the messenger". Your loyalty to your masters at LSM is glaring - if you can't defend the indefensible then it's time to throw the electronic equivalent of dust in the air.
As to my "fixation" on the Psalms, it's the most quoted book in the New Covenant/New Testament, and among the most crudely mangled by the disjointed exegesis of Mr. Lee. So it seemed like pretty low-hanging fruit. Your inability to address my comments on their face indicares that I'm on to something here.
|
There is a much simpler reason why I have not addressed your critique here - this thread is not about the Psalms and we have already discussed this topic at length in other threads, in particular, the one from which you quoted me in this thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
A better question is, why so many "thought nothing of it" when the expositor made such a hash out of scripture, and blithely overturned clear apostolic precedent in NT reception? Were they that stupefied, or were they cowed into silence by the incessant drumbeat of "oneness"? And to the point of this thread, how can one know the will of the Lord if this is their ''Christ''?
|
You are casting doubt on a person's ability to know the will of the Lord based upon your dissatisfaction with Lee's footnotes?