Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangelical
You were talking about something different -whether or not we should use leavened or unleavened bread.
You raised the matter of "regulatory ordinances", not I, because you eat from the tree of knowledge.
That is, the first thing that came to your mind was about the Law and regulations and you turned the discussion around to this matter. You were thinking about the Law, not Christ.
I on the other hand was thinking about how the symbol as pictured did not really represent Christ because leaven represents sin and Christ was unleavened. I read StG's words about the one loaf. I saw that the table does not really show this.
You will be unable to quote one word from me where I condemned the Body of Christ for using leavened bread, and why would I? - using the correct type of bread in communion does not turn a sect/denomination into a local church and so why would I care about what type of bread is used in them?
|
Evan, but you condemned the picture of the Lord's Table bread by
SonsToGlory in post #16 saying "
some of the bread is leavened, and some of the bread is unleavened. So this is a symbol of division as the bread is not all the same - even Catholics and Lutherans ensure that the bread is the same"
thus condemning the body of Christ for using leavened bread.
Thus it was you you raised the matter of "regulatory ordinances", proving, according to your assessment, that you eat from the tree of knowledge.
Read your posts again, bro. You condemn me for what you actually did. Shame on you. (Rom 2.1)
I simply pointed you to the scriptures which unveil the truths. I do understand though, having listened to Lee for years, that the scriptures frighten you, and it is far safer for you to stick to Lee's teachings, your HWFMR, and Life-Studies.