Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
Indiana,
Interesting reading up to this comment:
"The consensus among his co-workers was that Nee would not have made the distinction of being “the church”.
I have recently had the pleasure to re-read Brother Nee's fellowship on the "the church" in all the titles you would recognize. Brother Nee was very strong and adamant about our standing as the church in each locality. Unless you have something from Brother Nee to show he flipped that view then I would surmise that the consensus was in error.
Thanks
Drake
|
Your point might win out; there was certainly consensus on being strong for standing on the ground of oneness; notwithstanding, it is calling yourselves THEE church that makes the distinction and a line is crossed that may not be necessary.
It would be good if you can correct me IF needed. We're after the truth on this forum.