Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
I’m not asking for your definition of “shape”. Or any of the irrelevant meanderings about the Coming Seed, angels, creatures, frogs, bugs, Christmas Trees or Easter bunnies, tape recorders, ...or your ironic call for a line of love.
This is ultra simple and it is point of YOUR argument, not mineke
|
But if Lee wanted to talk about Christmas Trees or Easter Bunnies to make his point of cultural influences coming into Christianity, you would accept his "irrelevant meanderings", right? Or did you jump up and object after the lecture was over? I might have missed it.
Or if he wanted to meander about tea-ification, as the basis of his doctrine of deification, you were okay with that? Or, no? Did you hop up and say, "I'm being 'tea-ified'!" after the lecture was over? I mean, if we are all exactly identical in shape, form and purpose, isn't that what we're supposed to demonstrate?
Tea bags and water was okay, right? It's ultra-simple. If Lee wants to talk about something, fine. Don't go against the Mota. My point is that this has cultural roots.