Quote:
Originally Posted by awareness
What's missing in your theory is the fact that books written after AD 70 don't mention the sacking of Jerusalem. Your verses only hint at it, but with no specificity.
If the sacking of the temple was the fulfillment of prophecy, then why isn't it spelled out?
|
You mean by more than "no stone left upon another".
Are you referring to historical accounts like Josephus? Now I have seen numerous pictures of the Temple mount and there is "no stone left upon the other" if you are talking about the Temple. All they have left is the wailing wall which was part of the complex but not the actual temple.