Quote:
Originally Posted by Freedom
I spent some time reading through that linked thread and one thing that caught my attention was a list of all the midwest LC's that were removed from the church directory. Looks like at the time of the quarantine there were at least 20 churches that parted ways with LSM. That is a significant amount. It leaves me wondering what percentage of overall U.S. LC membership that represented. That percentage had to have been in the double digits.
It also makes me wonder how many of those churches that split off remain reminiscent of the LC vs those who have moved on completely.
|
The Midwest LC's never were as extreme as other regions. I doubt they have really changed much from what they were. When I left, many told me that things under TC were improving for the better. I was skeptical, because as a rule, unless the actual leaders at HQ change, there will by definition be little change. I was right. When TC expelled John Myer in Columbus, it was confirmed.
Btw, the story about Bill Barker of Chicago is key to understanding LSM's plot to knock off TC.
The quarantines actually caused many Midwest elders to rethink their mission. TC had prepped us all for many years that basically "WL good, BB bad." The simple paradigm worked until it was carefully thought thru. But how can you differentiate the leadership of WL and the Blendeds? If the Blendeds were "bad," how did they get that way? The "tract wars" between the Blended B's and the Concerned B's and these public forums caused many to understand the problems were inherent to WL, the Blendeds, and TC himself.
One by one, some of the LC elders which initially stood against the quarantines, siding with TC, eventually distanced themselves from him too. The issue with the BB's was control and legalism, but the issue with TC was control and abuse. I realize these are generalizations, but perhaps they will help.
Here is an old post I wrote when I was more familiar with the situation.