Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangelical
This is proof that Lee was consistent in upholding the teachings of Nee and should silence Freedom's speculation. It is also proof against Ohio's claims that Nee's writings on this matter have been altered.
|
My speculation is not coming out of nowhere. It is based on Nee/Lee's own materials as well as third party sources. Early on in the thread,
Drake stated the following: "
yet concerning the ground of the church there is no daylight between Bros Nee and Lee. They taught exactly the same thing."
This is the kind of talk that I consider to be nonsense, and I heard it time and time again in the LC. History indicates Nee changed his views and the things he emphasized, so it would be impossible for anyone to have taught the
exact same thing as Nee.
For example, in 1948, the emphasis shifted to handing everything over to the work. In the context of what Nee previously taught concerning autonomy, his later teaching wasn't consistent. As we know, Lee sought to uphold Nee's later teachings, but that doesn't mean what Lee taught was an accurate representation of Nee. That just means that what Lee taught was a representation of select things that Nee taught.