Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Read the book yourself, and do try to portray my views accurately.
|
I have read the book... and in trying to muster Watchman Nees support for your erroneous views on the Jerusalem principle being a work of Judaizers there is none.
That strange teaching you are promoting was a twisting of a term by the “autonomous churches” promoters in the Midwest. The term was originally introduced by Brother Nee in Further Talks and expounded on in the Resumption messages where he showed that principle as a work initiated by the Holy Spirit and explained our need to apply it in the work of ministry to the churches.
If you think I am wrong about that and portrayed it inaccurately then you can explain it yourself... or not! for the record in post 211 of this thread you said:
“......with workers sent out from headquarters overseeing the elders, and a Minister of the Age overseeing these workers.
Some have referred to this as the "Jerusalem Principle" practiced by Judaizers who were in some cases sent out by James.”
You apparently are included in “some” by your promotion of the notion.
Drake