Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
Sorry brother. I do not mean to ignore you, it’s just I can’t follow your logic most of the time. I try but your entries are often long, seem repetitive, a little complicated, and even when you ask a question in reply as above it’s worded in such a way that is different from the conversation, sometimes slightly, I might be having with someone else. That is why I have not responded to most of your posts.Drake
|
No problem, I'll try to make this simpler for you.
I said that WL and WN taught that the local churches were autonomous.
You challenged that.
Ohio, Untohim and Igzy provided quotes from both WL and WN proving that they in fact do teach this.
You said that "a careful reading of his point is in disagreement with your statement about autonomous local churches."
And I agreed with you that a careful reading of WL's ministry was not at all clear, rather I would call it doublespeak.
So I asked you if you could explain WL's position to us?