Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
Alb,
You introduced the footnote, not me. You chopped it up and are misrepresenting it, not me. I’m simply accommodating your preference to focus on the footnote. This footnote was chosen by you as the centerpiece of your argument. Now you want to run from it?
Since you wanted to focus on this footnote I now agree to engage you on it. We have plenty to discuss about this footnote.. in many ways. For instance, it seems as if you do not agree with its main point.... that Christ replaced the law and that God’s people should live Christ and not keep the law.
Drake
|
Was my point really so difficult to understand? Micah 6:8 said God declared something but Lee said it was Micah's own concept. There was not a single word mentioning Law in the verse (even the whole chapter) and Lee said it was about keeping the law.
Who was more trustworthy? Simple as that.
I repeat, it has nothing to do with the rest of the footnote.