Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
ZNP,
Oh, I don’t think most those are questions of inquiry but rather questions of presumption.
|
You said very clearly that you felt the response by many on this forum was in some way inappropriate.
Therefore I told you how I approached Ed Marks and discussed this with him and the response of both Ed and the church elders.
If you feel this was "hearsay" the decision by the elders was relayed to me by two serving brothers that I could approach and my son was also present and can act as another witness. Not to mention a number of saints who could verify parts of the story (I was there, I talked to Ed, I was then kicked out a little while later).
I would like you to tell me what the appropriate way would have been to approach Ed Marks?
I had learned that saints had been hurt, offended and in some cases left the recovery over this. Therefore I felt I had a responsibility to take these concerns to Ed.
So please, since you have already critiqued the response of many, tell me what I could have done that would have been more appropriate?
In #347 I asked "What is the proper way to protest sin?" Where is the "presumption"?
You were the one that said we were doing it wrong, so please, educate us, what is the correct way to protest sin?