Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
Points of agreement.
In order to receive the teaching that Witness Lee is the Minister of the Age you must also agree with the teaching concerning the Ministry of the Age and that in this age that ministry is the release of the truth concerning “the Ground of the Church”.
We also agree that this is a divisive issue, that not all Christians would accept this. However, there is the issue that the Lord said following him would be divisive. Families would be split, etc.
The verses you are referring to are here:
“32Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven.
33But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.
34Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
35For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
36And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
37He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.”
So if you apply these verses to justify the MOTA doctrine you are saying that this truth is equivalent to confessing Jesus or denying Jesus! Is this what you are saying or would you like to tweek that a little? Using these verses to justify MOTA on this forum is similar to hitting a hornets nest with a baseball bat.
It seems to me that verse 37 absolutely condemns the MOTA doctrine and therefore it demonstrates that the MOTA doctrine is equivalent to denying Christ before men.
|
LSM & Co. don't hold to the MOTA doctrine any longer. In fact, I heard they are scrubbing any reference to it from all Lee publications.
But of course. If Lee was the MOTA, if the Lord has a minister in every age, who is it now? No one. If the MOTA doctrine was/is something God has been doing, according to them, now God has changed His mind and plan, and no longer has a MOTA.
As a result LSM & Co. can no longer teach the MOTA doctrine. That's why they are working to remove it from all Lee publications.
Now they are pushing the Blended Brother's doctrine. Cuz now God is doing the Blended thing. Haha ... Just who do they think they are fooling? First they say -- from Nee by the way -- God has a MOTA, and now, after Nee and Lee are gone, God no longer has a MOTA. Haha again. What a joke!
How can any except the most gullible and credulous buy into it? Maybe they don't know about or admit to the MOTA doctrine taught by Nee and Lee. That's possible. And even more possible if Kangas removes all references to it from both LSM Nee and Lee documentation. I think that cat is already out of the bag. Ya can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. Because they've been unable to keep a lid on The One Publication, at least not all Nee docs can be scrubbed. Kangas can, however, scrub it from all Lee publications, since Lee is LSM's exclusive domain.
(P.S. - I remember when I first heard of the Blended Brothers I busted out laughing. How can anyone that was in the LC during the MOTA doctrine days still stay in when the Blended Brothers were introduced? I got the boot over disagreeing with the MOTA doctrine. So no one can tell me there wasn't a MOTA doctrine coming down from Anaheim. It turned me off to Lee, and resulted in one of the best things that ever happened in my life :
me leaving the LC. Amen Lord. Thank you Jesus. Hallelujah!!!)