Who was Adam?
One of the issues I have with Bushnell is that she attacks the very definition of man by stating or at least toying with the idea, in her book, that Adam was a hermaphrodite.
The implications of this view is that if Adam was a hermaphrodite, then Jesus as the "second Adam" was a hermaphrodite.
This is another example how Bushnell's books go beyond merely correctly interpreting the text, and espouse other theories which obviously come from the innate feminist bias in her.
Because of these things it is hard to trust that her interpretations of singular Greek or Hebrew words do not contain any feminist bias.
|