[Drake]

"Evangelical made a "compelling case" for there being "no male bias." Jane made a compelling case that there was male bias. Why don't we put the issue to the translators to verify the veracity of the translation? Why is that such a problem to you and your buddy?"

Ok, let's compare the two "compelling cases".

Jane alleges male bias in the KJV.

Evangelical compared several translations and the gender composition of those translators and showed clearly that the translations that had women were more aligned with KJV than others.

Jane has a hypothesis but no analysis. An opinion is not a compelling case.

If Jane, or you, want to refute his analysis you have the very same resources at your fingertips. He even provided the links he used. If you want to put it to translators then do it. That is part of your perogative in making your case.

It makes no difference to me personally whether you do or not.

Drake