Local Church Discussions - View Single Post

UntoHim · 08-31-2017, 10:12 PM

Sorry Drake, but your analysis is pretty much null and void because you switched horses right in the middle of the race. Genesis 3:16 is applicable to Jane's argument, but Genesis 4:7 is not. The "desire" in the former is very different to the "desire" in the latter. Jane's "reasoning" is solid, and the merits of her reasoning stand upon a very plausible understanding of the original presentation of the original author.
-

08-31-2017, 10:12 PM	#48
UntoHim Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 3,827	Re: New Jane Anderson Website Sorry Drake, but your analysis is pretty much null and void because you switched horses right in the middle of the race. Genesis 3:16 is applicable to Jane's argument, but Genesis 4:7 is not. The "desire" in the former is very different to the "desire" in the latter. Jane's "reasoning" is solid, and the merits of her reasoning stand upon a very plausible understanding of the original presentation of the original author. - __________________ αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11