[Ohio]

Originally Posted by Drake

Now as we await the arrival of the familiar plethora of irrelevant accusations of pots, kettles, gurus, misogyny, sexism, "denigrating Christian women", PL, Daystar, Chinese culture, Mao, Communists, and personal character assassination of the poster, etc. is there anybody here that will step up and provide a thorough and well thought out analysis of Genesis 3:16, the many translations of it, the gender composition of the various translation staff, in support of Jane Anderson's lemon teaching on this verse to challenge Evangelical's rational and logical presentation in refuting it?

It's truly incredible how much effort you current members will invest in order to discredit a book by an ex-member, yet will never apply those same efforts into critiquing LSM's aberrant teachings and practices.