Local Church Discussions - View Single Post

Evangelical · 08-30-2017, 04:42 AM

Jane says that our bibles today are Satanic:

"Satan is behind the production of these lemon translations".

wow. She is not just saying that these verses have been misused or misapplied, but that God is unable to preserve His Word, or worse, that He allowed Satan to corrupt them.

Apparently the bible is a mixture of grapes (God verses) and lemons (Satanic verses)

This is in stark contrast with this view of preservation:

The doctrine of preservation in regard to Scripture means that the Lord has kept His Word intact as to its original meaning. Preservation simply means that we can trust the Scriptures because God has sovereignly overseen the process of transmission over the centuries.

Her website is basically proclaiming that we cannot trust the Scriptures because God did not sovereingly oversee the process of transmission.

In Lemon 1 1 Corinthians 11:1–16 she says:

"It seems evident that the translators weren't really sure what Paul was saying" ~ seems evident according to her expertise as a scholar?
"The way they translated his words suggests they were under the influence of male bias". ~ of course, she knows exactly what the translators were thinking, she's the expert right?

She also changes God's Word just to match her views:

"I accomplish this by changing 'I would' to 'would I" in the opening phrase of verse 3"
"I conclude the quote with a question mark"

So she unashamedly changes God's Word from "I would...". to "would I...?" and completely reverse the meaning of the passage.

She then says:

"I am not a bible translator" but hopes that the changes will stimulate new thought and inspire some translators to do the work to "de-lemonise" the passages.

In other words, "I hope some real bible scholars will come and support my amateurish modifications".

The approach she takes is:

First presume that the lemon passages exist, and that the translators were under the influence of male bias which was in fact Satanic - i.e. God is unable to preserve His Word.
Then proceed to change verses here and there to match her presumptions - i.e. change God's Word
Then hope that these modifications will inspire serious bible scholars to fix the problems which she claims to exist .

08-30-2017, 04:42 AM	#16
Evangelical Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Posts: 3,965	Re: New Jane Anderson Website Jane says that our bibles today are Satanic: "Satan is behind the production of these lemon translations". wow. She is not just saying that these verses have been misused or misapplied, but that God is unable to preserve His Word, or worse, that He allowed Satan to corrupt them. Apparently the bible is a mixture of grapes (God verses) and lemons (Satanic verses) This is in stark contrast with this view of preservation: The doctrine of preservation in regard to Scripture means that the Lord has kept His Word intact as to its original meaning. Preservation simply means that we can trust the Scriptures because God has sovereignly overseen the process of transmission over the centuries. Her website is basically proclaiming that we cannot trust the Scriptures because God did not sovereingly oversee the process of transmission. In Lemon 1 1 Corinthians 11:1–16 she says: "It seems evident that the translators weren't really sure what Paul was saying" ~ seems evident according to her expertise as a scholar? "The way they translated his words suggests they were under the influence of male bias". ~ of course, she knows exactly what the translators were thinking, she's the expert right? She also changes God's Word just to match her views: "I accomplish this by changing 'I would' to 'would I" in the opening phrase of verse 3" "I conclude the quote with a question mark" So she unashamedly changes God's Word from "I would...". to "would I...?" and completely reverse the meaning of the passage. She then says: "I am not a bible translator" but hopes that the changes will stimulate new thought and inspire some translators to do the work to "de-lemonise" the passages. In other words, "I hope some real bible scholars will come and support my amateurish modifications". The approach she takes is: First presume that the lemon passages exist, and that the translators were under the influence of male bias which was in fact Satanic - i.e. God is unable to preserve His Word. Then proceed to change verses here and there to match her presumptions - i.e. change God's Word Then hope that these modifications will inspire serious bible scholars to fix the problems which she claims to exist .