Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangelical
I don't see what this has to do with what the bible says about the role of women. If I was you I would focus on the conundrum you have by the fact that Isaiah 3.12 says women ruling God's people is a negative thing and that is the plain and literal interpretation of this passage.
|
I know you don't.
But you continuously defend LSM's actions, and then tell us that, "
It is better to know when one sins and recognize the deception of the devil than to not know when one sins and not be able to recognize the deception or put up a fight," as if this convicts women of all time, and somehow justifies the male-dominated leadership of LSM.
So according to your conclusions ...
1. Male dominated LSM should "know one's sins and recognize the deception of the devil." But years of LC history shows us that is not true. WL covered up the continual pattern of abuse and molesting by his sons before and during the time of the "New Way."
2. Women should be banned from leadership because they are "
not able to recognize the deception or put up a fight," to which I responded that one little sister had more wisdom than all the male fighting leaders in Anaheim and Cleveland before and during the GLA quarantines.
Evangelly, why would God allow female Judges like Deborah, if it was so bad?
Do you know the difference between "banning all women from having any input" and having "all women leaders?" Are you so accustomed to LC extremism, that that is all you know?