Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
You think like that because you are afraid and taken captive. Therefore, why should anyone listen to you?
You see, if folks had to argue and debate you on the merits of your posts that might lead to having to agree with something you said, regardless of who you reference be it the Pope, or a Protestant minister, or a respected theologian , and if that were to happen that might imply an agreement with Witness Lee on something and then the very fabric of the universe would unravel.
|
This is more disingenuousness than I'm used to see coming from you, Drake.
So I must be hitting close to home.
In the first, place. I have debated with Evangelical many times. So please don't accuse me of not doing that.
(My frustration with him, and you, is that neither of you seem at all open to the idea that Lee was in error about anything. Debating with people with closed minds starts to feel pretty pointless. So eventually I feel to point out that their minds are closed. Your sarcastic response did nothing to change my feelings about that.)
In my experience Evangelical cherry-picks stuff from the Internet that agrees with him and then acts like that establishes his position as a winner. Well, as you both should know, it ain't necessarily so. That's why I don't do that. I could find a lot more quotes that contradict Lee about a lot of things, but if I did it wouldn't faze you. You'd just say everyone else was unclear.)
What I did is produce many
verses from the Bible itself that basically show that Noah's behavior violated direct teachings from the Bible on how we are to behave, especially when in leadership and positions of correction. I think those verses at least justified re-consideration of the knee-jerk belief that Noah's curse was righteous.
How did Evangelical respond? By equating my argument with those who justify gay "love." You call that a reasoned argument?
I wish Evangelical would quote Bible instead of Google.