Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangelical
Yes you've declared it to be hypocrisy but I still don't get why that means the Reformation should not have happened or was not God's move as you seem to be suggesting.
|
You have missed my points. It's almost impossible to converse with you. I address some of your false conclusions, and you create more.
For example, I ask how can you espouse a lineage of MOTA's from Luther to Lee, and yet denounce the papal lineage of the Catholic church? Then you interpret that as me endorsing Catholicism and rejecting Protestantism, when the point is that the N.T. allows for no lineages. The thought of blood lineages is completely O.T. with the failed Aaronic and Davidic lines. They really only served to point us to Christ.
To equate the Recovery with the Reformation has many self-serving elements for Lee. Why choose Luther as the first MOTA? Because Lee's movement was decidedly
The Unique Move of God. But was Martin Luther God's unique move? Was not God working in many areas? In fact, Luther was merely elevated to prominence because of German nobility. Nearly all the other reformers, lacking secular military might, were martyred. Did that make Luther more spiritual? The first MOTA? I think not.