Re: It's a Sham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Sham. That's a word I never thought I'd use to characterize Witness Lee, his ministry, and to some extent the Local Church itself.
This past week has been a real education on the history and character of WL, his ministry, and his successors. (I'm the guy from the "Some thoughts on this site" thread.)
A week ago if you would've told me "the Lord's Recovery is a group of Christians with an exclusivist attitude and weird, insular culture" I would've said "Yep, I've known that for a long time." But it wasn't until I was informed of this site and spent a lot of time reading the documents and comments, along with even more time reflecting, reminiscing, and writing about it myself that I can now conclude "it's a sham." That's a significant difference from merely calling it puffed up and peculiar.
A big thank-you to the core community here for hosting this site and providing this information. The real shame would be if these important historical records were lost.
p.s. I have some ideas how to better organize and communicate the information on this site. Let me know if you're interested.
|
Perhaps we should have had the definition of "sham" : https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sham and a description of what TLR "purports to be at the beginning of this discussion.
__________________
And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:14 NASB)
|