Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
Igzy,
That was not what Untohim said.
However LSM is a publishing company and they can choose to publish whomever they wish to. I can read whomever I wish to read. Obviously, Evangelical does too. Those two data points alone disprove Untohim's charge.
Yet, you are wrong that LSM only publishes Brother Lee.. They publish the speaking of half dozen brothers in the Ministry Magazine. Though they reference Brother Lee and Nee they also add their own experiences and fresh insights.
Furthermore, dozens of brothers have written and published articles in A&C. Kerry Robichaux has a book on Amazon.
So this forum continues to push a false narrative about this so called "edict" and" strictly forbidden" one publication that prevents anyone from reading and writing anything other than Brother Lee. Evangelical's non-LSM entries disproves that theory. Unless when you say "strictly forbidden" you don't mean strictly or forbidden.
As relates to this topic I am absolutely certain that LSM would not have published Jane's book. That is their right too.
Drake
|
You've totally missed my point.
My point was not that LSM doesn't have the right to publish whatever they want to. Of course they have that right.
The point is that LCM members have been instructed by their leaders through publications by LSM to have nothing published by ANY publisher. One of the beefs against Titus Chu was that he published his own books.
Of course, such edicts are wrong, backward, restrictive of the Lord's speaking and lend to suspicions that the LCM is a cult.
It is also a moral hazard for LSM to publish those edicts. What does it say about a publishing company when it publishes commands from church leaders instructing church members to not compete with the publications of that company?