Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
I viewed this as a well-balanced design structure falling straight down.
I don't understand this. I'm not sure what kind of investigation you felt was needed. I watched the airplane fly into building #2, so I knew why it fell and how.
What do you mean "inside job?"
Most folks don't know about these top secret meetings.
What evidence was destroyed? I thought it was hauled off to a land fill, after carefully checking for DNA.
I know of two bridges that melted due to relatively small fires. I would think each case needs to be examined. Modern airliners with a full tank of gas landing inside of a tower is pretty rare event.
With the entire weight of that tower in motion, those 58 posts all crumbled together like toothpicks.
I've heard this a couple times before, and not sure what to make of it, not knowing all the facts.
What alarm are you referring to? What key tests should have been done?
Not aware that thermite was discovered in significant quantities.
|
Thermite was discovered in the dust by professionals that were stymied by the roadblocks in the regular investigation. What was especially interesting is that the signature of this thermite indicated that it was a weaponized form that could not be manufactured by your run of the mill terrorists. They were able to find research papers out of our military labs that describe these kind of improvements to thermite (micro nodules or some other technology). Allows for the reaction to take place quicker and more explosively.
The Thermite was a red color, like that primer paint they paint on steel. Which is interesting because work was being done on the steel for a few weeks prior to 9/11.
By 2014 2,300 architects and engineers signed a petition demanding an independent investigation with subpoena power.