Quote:
Originally Posted by Freedom
. . . .The real issue is that when you look at the LC, a lot of what they attempt to use for validation is just an excuse mechanism. When they fail increase in size, they claim that they only need to be small. The LC likes to point to the fact that they are small, that they are 'weak' or that they have been under 'attack' (criticism), as if those things provide an automatic validation the LC.
|
That kind of thinking reminds me of the people who are certain that
[enter the name of your favorite conspiracy theory here] is really true because the fact that the government denies that it is true is evidence of its truth. Or the fact that there is evidence against it is evidence that it is true.
Or, as Charlie Brown puts it, "How can we lose when we're so sincere?"