Quote:
Originally Posted by YP0534
On the other hand, the lack of citation in the listed instances appears to be more the churchman's offense against the scholar.
|
I don't see this as an "offense" matter, if I am hearing you correctly.
This article on "
Plagiarism" strikes at the root of LSM pride, elitism, exclusivism, judgmentalism, arrogance, hypocrisy, etc. Early on ... yes ... there were many references to Vincent, Alford, Pember, Panton, Govett, etc., but that tapered off over time as "the ministry" made outrageous claims to "subsume" all others, while boasting in its own accomplishments.
Either way, any Christian publisher which sets itself up as an authority on "all things Christian" (think
A&C) must be above reproach in all its works. Whether or not WL gives credit where credit is due
in every spoken message is one thing, but the author and his editorial staff must give credit
in each and every written message before publishing.
Am I missing something here?