Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
He did teach deification. That is not up for debate. Ask Kerry R.
The only thing that you can debate is what the word means. But you don't use a dictionary, you use WL's own special definition.
I am not slandering him. I have quoted him completely, thoroughly and with context. I have made it clear that he always has his caveat there.
My point is simple.
1. Using this word is forbidden by the Bible. (A point that WL made in 1984).
2. Using this word is to "go beyond what the apostle's taught" and manifests that WL is not of the apostle's fellowship.
3. Trying to use a highly provocative word by creating your own special ("limited") definition is deceitful, subject to strict judgement, and typical of a false prophet.
These points are not "straws". They completely discredit his ministry from the point he began to teach this and they expose his modus operandi.
|
Where is this written proof that he taught deification? I don't want to see an argument about semantics, I want to see a definite statement where he said men could or should be worshipped.