Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangelical
LSM does not "need it so badly" as you suggest. CRI and the Christian community were wrong, and that was more or less their admission of guilt for lying and slandering the local churches, hence the title "we were wrong".
|
And yet when Lee said "we were wrong" regarding receiving the brothers, that can be ignored? Why so selective?
CRI's admission of malfeasance was reprinted and passed to every local church. Witness Lee's admission of malfeasance was. . . buried? Along with him?
And I still don't get why CRI's imprimatur is pulled out of the drawer, whether or not the conversation included it, as verification of LSM/LC orthodox credibility, when CRI's receiving other Christian groups as also credible, genuine, legitimate corporate expressions of NT Christian faith is stubbornly ignored. Why does approval work only when it's in your direction? That simply makes no sense.