Quote:
Originally Posted by UntoHim
Of course brother Lee was a different person than Phillip Lee...HE WAS HIS FATHER AND HIS EMPLOYER...Which made him DOUBLY responsible before God AND man, especially when it became very clear that Phillip was a raging alcoholic and sexual predator. Instead of being behind the lead desk of a Christian ministry and publishing company, he should of been behind bars. Every time Phillip Lee's improprieties and criminal behavior were exposed, Witness Lee blamed, attacked and defamed the whistle blowers. In the case of the sisters he abused, instead dealing with his criminal son, he had the victim and her family relocated to another state. Despicable, and something one might expect from a godless, immoral businessman, and not a so call "God-man".
And Local Churchers wonder why people call them a personality cult. Most other legitimate Christian leaders would have been publicly exposed, sued by the victims and removed from public ministry for an extended period of time. But of course this would of required the leadership of the Local Church to be transparent and accountable, like what is clearly taught in the New Testament. Instead everyone, from top to bottom, was/is only accountable to the person and work of Witness Lee.
-
|
http://www.twoturmoils.com/Theocracy...alChurches.pdf
“One basic item of the change in nature in the Lord’s recovery is that it appears the Lord’s work has become Brother Lee’s work; the churches have become Brother Lee’s churches; and the Lord’s workers have become Brother Lee’s workers”
“We are at a critical juncture. We cannot be silent regarding the change of nature in the Lord’s recovery. We should have no part in it. This is a day for further recovery. We need a new beginning to recover us back from the change of nature to the Lord’s original intention. We must discard all the changes of nature and come out of the system; it cannot change.” (Two Senior Coworkers from Taiwan 1988)