Quote:
Originally Posted by Gubei
Problematic is the abuse of that truth by some immature and “naïve” saints who blindly follow the truth. They do not know how much and how seriously they can be “divisive” by wrongly using the ground of locality which is supposed to be used for the opposite purpose..
Such expressions as “concubines,” “illegal building-ups” which were used to describe other denominations were enough to prove that the attitude we had was very far way from the “sprit” of the ground of locality - oneness, I believe. Fortunately, WL repented his wrong attitude at his final official conference.
|
Before I begin Gubei when I read your posts responding to OBW or Igzy I consider your posting to be debating through discussions, but still keeping a oneness in spirit.
I was one who at one time had maintained "the ground of locality" was the only way and any other way was illegitimate. I had since repented of my divisive spirit. The "ground of locality" I see now as a divisive doctrine which divides and in some cases excludes Christians from meeting.
In Witness Lee's final conference, what "wrong attitude" he repent for? It seems what I had heard third party was exactly as you're saying, but it is contrary to what LSM released.
Terry