Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
Yes they do own men. The Church owns the people, and the ministry owns the church. Period. Point-blank. They can pussy-foot around it, but in cases like what Ohio outlined above, the issue raises itself in all its blatant ugliness. Who owns the saints? Titus and the GLA, or the Blendeds and Anaheim?
|
During the conflict in Anaheim, while John Ingalls and the other elders were attempting to bring the church back to Christ and His word, Titus Chu wrote a letter to John and the other elders. The following was included in this public letter and recorded also in
STTIL ...
Quote:
Was it not Brother Lee who raised up the church? [in Anaheim] Has it not been our brother who ministered tirelessly and unselfishly from the beginning? Did not our brother appoint you as elders? Has he not considered the church in Anaheim his church base out from which he has gone to carry out the ministry committed to him by the Lord? Is it not a fact that you brothers and the church in Anaheim owe him your existence?
|
The message from Titus Chu (and co-written by J. Reetzke Sr.) is to forget unrighteousness and criminal activity at LSM, forget what damage they have inflicted upon the saints under your care, forget it all
because you owe Lee, and he owns you. Such is the justification and vindication awarded to God's Deputy Authority.