View Single Post
Old 12-18-2008, 02:51 PM   #132
OBW
Member
 
OBW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,384
Default Re: "Early Nee" vs. "Later Nee"

Quote:
Originally Posted by UntoHim View Post
Can anybody give us one, just one concrete example where a group of Local Churchers (those associated with Nee/Lee) moved to a place that already had a group of Christians meeting in oneness (as the church in...) and joined with them, submitting to their established elders and taking the one ministry of their one apostle? Just one?...is there just one example?.... Watchman Nee clearly taught that when a group of Christians moves to a city they should join with "the church in so-and-so" that is already there. Did Lee and his followers EVER do this...even ONE TIME?

Silence...or sounds of crickets....

I rest my case.
Better than that, can anyone show where a group of LCers moved to another city and decided to just be one with whoever they found there rather than setting up a new paradigm of restrictions on what constitutes oneness?

By agreeing to only consider joining with certain types of groups, they have already excluded some. Where is the oneness in that?

Don't turn my question back on me. Under the Lee/LSM/LC view of oneness is there not a theoretical problem with moving to a new place and ignoring some Christians as worthy of consideration?
__________________
Mike
I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge
OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel
OBW is offline   Reply With Quote