Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregon
The New Testiment is full of verses showing that in the apostles days all the believers in each city where the gospel went were the church in that city. There were no multible chuches in localities. Because there are no verses in the bible such as II Igzy 4:3 " Thou shalt gather as the church in your city" you claim that the scriptures don't teach one church one city. The posters here willfully take their own logic over the scriptures.
|
Oregon, don't you have time to formulate something better than this? Or is this the best you can do?
I would like to discuss this issue of locality with you. But you seem content to hide behind the barricades of your dogma and hurl insults over the wall. Why are you so afraid to take on the apparent weaknesses in this doctrine you've been told to believe?
No one in the LC ever addressed the holes in this doctrine. So what are you supposed to do when someone attacks the deity of Christ? You are supposed to have an answer. You are supposed to employ
logic (e.g. if Jesus wasn't God, who was he?). But because you can't logically defend your locality doctrine, you resort to insulting logic itself. That's very disappointing.
I'm still awaiting answers. How do I know who the true elders in Toronto are?