Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
And they do try to be scholarly, today: I read one of the latest A & C position papers and it would qualify as an undergraduate-level paper, but certainly not graduate level. Nobody is going to take their supposed scholarship seriously. Just more merchandise to wave in front of the faithful remnant. They're so out of touch they don't even know what scholarly looks like; they're probably 80 years behind the times. Or more. Only an ignorant person, or the die-hard LC faithful, will actually receive what they put out, as if it were valid.
|
I think you should not conflate LSM with FTT. I get your point about LSM wanting to appear scholarly with its A&C. However in this thread, we are talking about the FTT, not LSM. FTT is not meant to be academic; one is not required to write a thesis/article in A&C before he can graduate from FTT.